So after the argument in my last blog post, I go on the video to see how the discussion is doing and see this. And I decide to interject.
Just wanted to stop by and make sure the Christian Cult of Child Murder was still going strong! Good job baby killers, keep praising your middle eastern masters!
LeoWolfComedy 1 day ago
@LeoWolfComedy WHAT!!! Christians don't kill babies. We are AGAINST abortion. It is plain, mortally wrong, and God made everyone for a reason. I'll pray for you!
@BuddyChesnut Wrong moron. Yahweh DEMANDED the murder of "Suckling Infants" in 1st Samuel. Your "God" is the God of baby killing! He is the MASTER of late term abortion. You don't even know your own religion.
LeoWolfComedy 1 day ago
@LeoWolfComedy Have you forgotten the "evolutionist's incident" in the early 1900's? You don't even know your own religion!
1r34kh4v0k 1 day ago
@1r34kh4v0k*I* don't know what it is either....lol - while you're teasing together the shreds of your story of the evolutionists incident into something you regard as a intelligent argument (will it involve declarations of proof for supernatural powers based on newspaper clippings again?), stop by your nearest dictionary and check out "religion" okay mate? ta.
TheRealityofNature 1 day ago
@TheRealityofNature In the early 1900s, evolutionists managed to get a bill passed in America that prohibited marriage and reproduction of "inferior human beings."By inferior, they meant any mentally handicapped, sick, people without an education, and overall people of lesser health-even kids.They forced sterilization of these people against their will and urged all upper class white Americans to reproduce as fast as possible. Their reason for doing so was simple, they had been taught evolution.
1r34kh4v0k 21 hours ago
@1r34kh4v0k
Well I'd consider that immoral!
isn't it a good thing we don't live in the start of the 21st century any more!?
what other irrelevant andecdotes can you vomit all over youtube?
TheRealityofNature 21 hours ago
@TheRealityofNature Except the underlying fundamental of evolution these people were acting on is actually the very driving force that you believe to be happening in nature today. So, you believe evolution to be immoral?
1r34kh4v0k 21 hours ago
@1r34kh4v0k
evolution is a dumb process - it is neither moral nor immoral. to ask is to betray a breathtakingly inadequate understanding of the process.
Hitler also used evolution to validate his Aryan race - I'm surprised you didn't bring that up too.
That people use the discovery of metallurgy to fabricate guns to murder people hardly means "metallurgy is immoral" - what a stupid connection to make.
To validate bigotry on a dumb process is also as stupid connection to make.
TheRealityofNature 21 hours ago
@TheRealityofNature I brought up Hitler, the Cambodian regimes, the French Revolution, and the Soviet Russia earlier. I was just giving yet another example. To say that evolution is neither a moral nor immoral process gets taken to a whole new level when you start to justify such actions because of that process. It is no longer "a dumb process that is morally neutral."
1r34kh4v0k 21 hours ago
@1r34kh4v0k
"I brought up Hitler, the Cambodian regimes, the French Revolution, and the Soviet Russia earlier"..
and? are you purporting that these were not driven purely by power?
"To say that evolution is neither a moral nor immoral process..."
erm...
okay.. is the sun rise a moral or immoral process?
yes, I REALLY DO want you to answer this question!
TheRealityofNature 21 hours ago
@TheRealityofNature No, I was stating that when LeoWolfComedy loves to hop on the bandwagon to point out everything "evil" Christianity has done - he's doing so with a black eye towards evolution. Yes, the sun rise is neither immoral or moral - but you don't see people doing 'morally neutral acts" that include forcing sterilization to those where "the sunlight does not reach.
1r34kh4v0k 21 hours ago
@1r34kh4v0k
you are.. incredible. After right before you admitting that it's stupid to label a process as moral, you actually go and do it anyhow.A process HAPPENS - DEAL with it!. People's sometimes try justify their immorality on observed phenomena - does that mean the phenomena is bad? what? what the fuck are you talking about you moron!? The fault is the PERSON, not the phenomena!.. holy fucking jesus shit, can you BE more fucking inane?TheRealityofNature 20 hours ago
@TheRealityofNature That's exactly the point I was trying to show LoeWolf. He likes to jump on and say "Christianity was the cushion behind these genocides!! Christianity is so bad, oh no Christianity, Woe are Christianis because they're so evil!!" without fully realizing that evolution has done 10x worse.
I think it would make more sense if you honestly just stayed out of debates that you're not in :-)
1r34kh4v0k 20 hours ago
@1r34kh4v0k oh evolution is a dumb process that is amoral. you just argued that it starts to have moral reprucussions when its used to justify "such actions". those are your words. you are therefore necessarily implying that we give morality to things because if something starts out not having any morality and then it gets morality once we use it as an excuse for something, then you are necessarily saying that anything we want can have morality and that we can assign morality to things. lmao
JustTrollinAlong 1 second ago
- @1r34kh4v0k pt 2 of my comment.
youre saying that it doesnt matter if x is amoral. if we use x to justify actions that have moral reprucussions, the morality of our actions if therefore reflected on x.
so if i take a rock and hit you in the head to beat some sense into you, and i justify it by saying the wrong is senseless so it might cancel out your senselessness, then that therefore makes the rock immoral because my immoral action gives the amoral rock morality.
one word--ridiculous!
JustTrollinAlong 6 hours ago
He then removed his comment which said he was just trying to show leowolf that people used xianity as a cushion for genocide, Basically as a means of justifying genocide. I called bullshit and pointed out his comments above.
i will continue to update as the argument progresses, if it does.
No comments:
Post a Comment